Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05111
Original file (BC 2012 05111.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2012-05111
		
		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Narrative Reason for Separation on her DD 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, of “Fraudulent Entry Into Military Service/Drug Abuse” be removed. 

 _______________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She tested positive for marijuana because of her exposure to second hand marijuana smoke.  She was a caretaker for her father, who had a medical condition for which he was legally prescribed, and used, medical marijuana in their household.  Her military record should not reflect prior drug use on her part.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________ ______________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 21 Jun 10, the applicant signed the AF Form 2030, USAF Drug and Alcohol Abuse Certificate, stating she had never used or experimented with marijuana.  

The applicant initially entered the Air Force on 19 Oct 10.  

On 19 Oct 10, the applicant again signed the AF Form 2030 stating she had not used marijuana since she originally signed the AF Form 2030 on 21 Jun 10.

On 19 Oct 10, the applicant submitted USMEPCOM Form 601-23-5-R-E stating she had not used marijuana during her DEP enlistment.  

On 23 Oct 10, the applicant submitted a urine sample which tested positively for marijuana (THC 28). 

On 17 Nov 10, the applicant’s commander notified her he was recommending her for discharge from the Air Force for fraudulent entry.  The reason for this action was that she intentionally concealed drug use prior to service, which if revealed, could have resulted in rejection of her enlistment.  The applicant waived her right to legal counsel and to submit statements.  

On 19 Nov 10, the discharge authority accepted the commander’s recommendation and directed the applicant’s Entry Level Separation (ELS) with uncharacterized service for Fraudulent Enlistment.  

Airmen are given ELS with uncharacterized service when separation is initiated in the first 180 days of continuous active service.  The Department of Defense (DoD) determined it would be unfair to the member and the service to characterize a member’s limited service when separation is initiated within the first 180 days of active service.  

On 22 Nov 10, the applicant was furnished an ELS with uncharacterized service and a narrative reason for separation of “Fraudulent Entry into Military Service/Drug Abuse.” 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at Exhibit C. 

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice.  Based on the documentation in the applicant’s master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11 Jan 13 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice concerning the applicant’s request to remove Fraudulent Entry from her DD Form 214.  We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  The applicant was well aware of her extensive exposure to marijuana smoke prior to applying to the Air Force and was given ample opportunity to present and discuss her situation with her recruiter and the appropriate personnel at her Military Entry Processing Station (MEPS).  She declined to do so.  If revealed, her situation could have resulted in rejection of her enlistment.  Therefore, the Board believes the applicant’s actions comply with the definition of fraudulent entry.  However, in the interest of justice we feel the phrase “Fraudulent Entry into Military Service” sufficiently describes her reason for separation, and the stigma of the words “drug abuse” serves no additional purpose.  Therefore, we believe it is in the interest of justice to recommend her record be corrected as indicated below.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that  Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, of her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to read “Fraudulent Entry Into Military Service,” rather than “Fraudulent Entry Into Military Service/Drug Abuse.”

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05111 in Executive Session on 18 Jul 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member



All members voted to correct the records, as recommended.  The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05111 was considered:

	 Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 1 Oct 12, w/atchs.
	 Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	 Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 19 Dec 12.
	 Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Jan 13.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair






2











Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02998

    Original file (BC 2014 02998.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02998 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment (RE) Code of “2G” (Fraudulent Entry into Military Service, Drug Abuse) be changed to allow him to reenlist in the military. We note that AFPC/DPSOA has determined that the RE code of 2G was issued to the applicant in error and will correct his records to reflect that his RE code is 2C. THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01584

    Original file (BC-2005-01584.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 Nov 04, applicant certified she had not used any drug, including marijuana, since she originally completed the AF Form 2030. The discharge authority approved the discharge and directed that applicant be discharged with an uncharacterized entry-level separation. ___________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2005- 01584 in Executive Session on 3 August 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Ms....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00582

    Original file (BC-2009-00582.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant has provided no evidence showing that his separation and RE codes are in error or contrary to the prevailing instruction. Therefore, in the absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary, we adopt the rationale provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice and conclude that no basis exists to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01594

    Original file (BC-2007-01594.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Additionally, the applicant provided no facts warranting a change in her character of service or narrative reason for separation. Rather, as indicated by the Air Force, an entry-level separation with uncharacterized service is used in those cases where the member has not yet completed six months of service at the time separation proceedings were, for whatever reason, initiated. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01945

    Original file (BC-2008-01945.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provided a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 293, Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed Force of the United States, documents extracted from his military personnel records and an extract from Army Regulation (AR) 601-210. On 9 Dec 02, his commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for fraudulent entry. AFPC/DPSOA's complete evaluation is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02563

    Original file (BC-2005-02563.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02563 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 FEB 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code and Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to allow him to reenlist in military service. As a result, of the positive drug test, the applicant was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02620

    Original file (BC-2002-02620.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2002-02620 INDEX CODE 110.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason on his DD Form 214 not reflect “Fraudulent Entry” and he be reinstated into the Air Force. On 12 Nov 01, he again signed AF Form 2030 (re-certification at time of enlistment) indicating he had not used any...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00170

    Original file (BC-2011-00170.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 16 Nov 10. On 13 Dec 10, the applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to recommend his discharge from the Air Force for Fraudulent Enlistment. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-00170 in Executive...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-03493

    Original file (BC-2002-03493.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    She asserted she did not tell her recruiter or report her drug use on her security form because she felt she would not be able to enlist in the Air Force. A 1 Dec 00 medical entry reported the applicant presented with upper back pain after carrying her backpack, apparently on her left side. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded her general discharge for fraudulent enlistment should be changed to an honorable discharge for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00904

    Original file (BC-2010-00904.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00904 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “2C” (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow him to reenter the military. ...